1.2: Conceptual difference between Data, Information and Knowledge.

BLIS-201: Information and Communication.

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. About Data, Information & Knowledge
3. Conceptual difference between Data, Information, and Knowledge
4. Conclusion
5. References

1. Introduction:

Data, information, and knowledge are fundamental concepts in the field of information management and play crucial roles in decision-making and problem-solving processes. Data refers to raw, unorganized facts or figures, such as numbers, text, or symbols. It lacks any inherent meaning or context. Data can be collected through various sources, such as surveys, sensors, or manual entry. However, on its own, data is typically useless and difficult to interpret.
Information, on the other hand, is derived from data through the process of organizing, analyzing, and interpreting it. Information provides context, relevance, and meaning to data, enabling individuals to understand and make sense of it. It is structured and presented in a way that facilitates comprehension and supports decision-making.Knowledge goes a step further and represents a deeper level of understanding that individuals acquire through experience, expertise, and learning. Knowledge incorporates information, personal insights, and practical know-how. It is a combination of theoretical understanding and practical application, allowing individuals to apply their expertise to solve problems and make informed decisions.
In summary, data represents raw facts and figures, information is the organized and meaningful representation of data, and knowledge encompasses a deeper level of understanding and expertise gained through experience and learning. These concepts form the foundation of effective information management and are essential for driving informed decision-making in various fields.

2. About Data, Information & Knowledge:

Let's establish the key terms for discussing:

Data:

Information:

Knowledge:

3. Conceptual difference between Data, Information, and Knowledge:

3.1 Data: Data refers to raw and unprocessed facts or figures. It lacks context or meaning on its own and requires further processing to transform it into meaningful information. In its raw form, data does not convey any specific message or answer any particular question. UNESCO defines data as 'facts, concepts or instructions in a formalised manner suitable for communication, interpretation or processing by human or automatic means'. Robert A. Arnold, in his 'Modern Data Processing' [Wiley, 1972], has defined the terms in the context of commerce as a function of business and accounting.
Examples:

A list of numbers: 5, 12, 8, 3, 9.
Temperature readings: 25°C, 28°C, 30°C.
Student IDs: 001, 002, 003, 004.

In these examples, the data is presented without any interpretation or analysis. It is merely a collection of values that, on their own, do not provide any useful insights or understanding.
3.2 Information: Information is the processed and meaningful form of data. It involves organizing, analyzing, and interpreting data to provide context and value. Information helps answer specific questions, make informed decisions, and gain understanding. As per American Library Association, "Information refers to messages or knowledge encoded in any form or format that is useful to the user and facilitates cognitive processes such as learning, understanding, and problem-solving."
Examples

Statistical reports: Analyzing data on population growth in different regions.
Weather forecasts: Interpreting temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure data to predict weather conditions.
Book summaries: Condensing the content of a book into a concise overview.

In these examples, data is transformed into meaningful information by applying various processes such as analysis, interpretation, summarization, and contextualization. Information allows us to gain insights and draw conclusions.
3.3 Knowledge: Knowledge represents organized information that is acquired through experience, reasoning, or study. It goes beyond individual facts and focuses on the understanding and application of information to solve problems, make decisions, and create new insights. "Knowledge involves connecting information with experience, expertise, and context to generate actionable insights and understanding." (Buckland, 1991).
Examples

Expertise in a particular field: In-depth understanding of a subject area, gained through study and practical experience.
Problem-solving skills: Applying knowledge to analyze complex situations and devise effective solutions.
Professional judgment: Making informed decisions based on a combination of information and personal experience.

In these examples, knowledge is the result of assimilating and internalizing information over time. It involves critical thinking, comprehension, and the ability to apply acquired knowledge in practical scenarios.

4. Conclusion:

In conclusion, data, information, and knowledge form a hierarchical relationship, with data being the raw material, information being the processed and meaningful form of data, and knowledge being the organized understanding and application of information. Understanding the distinctions between these terms is crucial for professionals in the field of Library and Information Science, as it enables effective information management, retrieval, and dissemination.

5. References:

American Library Association. (1989). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report.
Dalkir, K. (2013). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Rowley, J. (2007). The Wisdom Hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW Hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
Choo, C. W. (2002). Information Management for the Intelligent Organization: The Art of Scanning the Environment (3rd ed.). Information Today.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
Hara, N. (2009). Communities of Practice: Fostering Peer-to-Peer Learning and Informal Knowledge Sharing in the Work Place. Springer.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Buckland, M. (1991). Information as Thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351-360.

***END***

DISCLAIMER