2.4 Communication Models: Shannon and Weaver's, Lasswell's, and Wilbur Schramm's.
BLIS-201: Information and Communication.
1. Introduction
Communication models are conceptual frameworks that describe the process of communication between a sender and a receiver. They provide a visual representation or a simplified view of how information is transmitted, received, and interpreted in a communication system. These models help us understand the various elements and factors that influence effective communication.Communication models typically involve a sender, a message, a channel or medium through which the message is transmitted, a receiver, and feedback. They may also include additional components such as noise or barriers to communication.
Different communication models have been developed over time, each emphasizing different aspects of the communication process. Here are a few well-known communication models:
2. Shannon-Weaver Model of Communication
The Shannon-Weaver model, developed by Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver in 1949, is a widely recognized and influential communication model. Also known as the "linear model" or "transmission model," it focuses on the process of transmitting information from a sender to a receiver through a channel. The model highlights the roles of encoding, decoding, and noise in the communication process.
Here's a detailed explanation of the Shannon-Weaver model:
1. Sender: The sender is the person or entity who initiates the communication process by creating a message to be transmitted. The message could be in the form of spoken words, written text, visual images, or any other form of communication.
2. Encoding: Encoding refers to the process of converting the sender's ideas, thoughts, or information into a symbolic form that can be transmitted. This involves selecting appropriate words, symbols, or signals to convey the intended meaning.
3. Message: The message is the information that the sender intends to communicate. It can be in the form of words, images, gestures, or any other mode of expression.
4. Channel: The channel is the medium through which the message is transmitted from the sender to the receiver. It could be a face-to-face conversation, telephone, email, social media, or any other means of communication.
5. Decoding: Decoding is the process by which the receiver interprets and understands the message sent by the sender. The receiver assigns meaning to the symbols or signals used in the message and tries to grasp the sender's intended meaning.
6. Receiver: The receiver is the person or entity for whom the message is intended. They receive and interpret the message sent by the sender.
7. Noise: Noise refers to any factor or interference that disrupts the communication process and hinders the accurate transmission or reception of the message. It can be external, such as background noise or distractions, or internal, such as preconceived notions or language barriers.
8. Feedback: Feedback is the response or reaction of the receiver to the message sent by the sender. It allows the sender to assess the effectiveness of the communication and make necessary adjustments. Feedback can be in the form of verbal or non-verbal cues, such as gestures, facial expressions, or written or spoken words.
The Shannon-Weaver model emphasizes the importance of effective encoding and decoding to ensure accurate transmission and understanding of the message. It recognizes that noise can distort or interfere with the communication process and highlights the need for feedback to gauge the success of the communication. While the Shannon-Weaver model provides a simplified representation of the communication process, it has been criticized for its linear and one-way nature, overlooking the complexities of human communication, such as context, emotions, and social factors. Nonetheless, it remains a foundational model in the field of communication studies.
3. Lasswell's model of communication
Lasswell's model of communication, proposed by political scientist Harold Lasswell in 1948, is a simple and influential communication model that focuses on answering the fundamental questions of communication: "Who says what, in which channel, to whom, with what effect?" It aims to analyze the essential elements involved in the process of communication. The model breaks down the communication process into five key components:
1. Sender: The model begins by identifying the sender, who is the source of the communication or the person initiating the message. The sender can be an individual, a group, or an organization. They have a specific purpose or intention for communicating and convey a message to the receiver.
2. Message: The message is the actual information, idea, or content that the sender wants to communicate to the receiver. It can take various forms, such as verbal, written, visual, or non-verbal cues. The message may include facts, opinions, emotions, instructions, or any other relevant communication content.
3. Channel: The channel refers to the medium or the means through which the message is transmitted from the sender to the receiver. It can be face-to-face conversation, telephone, television, email, social media, or any other communication channel. The choice of channel can significantly impact the effectiveness of the communication process.
4. Receiver: The receiver is the target audience or the individual/group for whom the message is intended. They receive and interpret the message sent by the sender. The receiver's understanding, perception, and interpretation of the message play a crucial role in effective communication.
5. Effect: The final component of Lasswell's model is the effect, which refers to the impact or outcome of the communication process on the receiver. The effect can vary depending on the intended purpose of the communication. It can include actions, changes in attitudes or beliefs, emotional responses, or any other response triggered by the message.
Lasswell's model of communication provides a concise framework for analyzing the basic elements of communication and their interplay. It highlights the importance of understanding the roles of the sender, message, channel, receiver, and effect in any communication process. However, it should be noted that the model oversimplifies the complexities and dynamics of real-life communication situations, and it does not account for factors such as feedback, context, and noise.
4. Gerbner's model of communication
George Gerbner's model of communication is known as the "Cultivation Theory." It was developed by George Gerbner, a prominent communication scholar, in the late 1960s and expanded upon in subsequent years. The theory focuses on the long-term effects of media exposure on individuals' perceptions and beliefs about the world.
The central idea of Gerbner's model is that television and other forms of media have a cumulative effect on shaping people's understanding of reality. The theory suggests that repeated exposure to certain media content, particularly television, can influence individuals' attitudes, beliefs, and values, thereby shaping their perception of the world around them. Key elements of Gerbner's model include:
1. Cultivation Analysis: Gerbner proposed cultivation analysis as the main methodological approach to studying the effects of television. It involves analyzing the content of television programming and the long-term effects it has on viewers' perceptions.
2. Mainstreaming: Gerbner argued that heavy television viewers, regardless of their individual characteristics, tend to develop a shared perception of reality. This phenomenon, known as mainstreaming, suggests that the constant exposure to television content leads to a convergence of viewpoints among viewers.
3. Resonance: Gerbner introduced the concept of resonance to explain the amplified effects of television on individuals who have real-life experiences that align with what they see on screen. For example, if someone has personally experienced violence and then sees a high level of violence on television, the impact of cultivation may be stronger.
4. Cultivation Differential: The cultivation differential refers to the differences in perceptions between heavy viewers and light viewers of television. Gerbner argued that heavy viewers, due to their extensive exposure, are more likely to adopt the beliefs and values portrayed in media content compared to light viewers.
Gerbner's model of communication suggests that the continuous exposure to media content over time contributes to the formation of shared perceptions and beliefs about the world. It implies that heavy reliance on television as a primary source of information can shape individuals' understanding of social reality, influencing their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors.
While Gerbner's model has received significant attention and sparked numerous studies, it is important to note that it has also faced criticism. Some critics argue that the theory oversimplifies the complexities of media effects and overlooks the active role of audiences in interpreting and making meaning from media messages. Additionally, the model primarily focuses on television as the dominant medium, while today's media landscape includes a wide array of platforms and content sources.
Overall, Gerbner's model of communication provides valuable insights into the long-term impact of media exposure on individuals' perceptions and understanding of the world, highlighting the need for critical media literacy and awareness of the potential influence of media messages.
5. Schramm model of communication
The Schramm model of communication, also known as the "Interactive Model," was proposed by Wilbur Schramm, a prominent communication theorist. This model emphasizes the interactive and reciprocal nature of communication, highlighting the role of feedback in the process. It is often represented as a circular diagram to illustrate the continuous exchange of messages between the sender and receiver.
Let's delve into the various components of the Schramm model:
1. Sender: The sender is the individual or entity initiating the communication process. They encode their message, which involves selecting and organizing the information they wish to convey.
2. Message: The message is the information or content being transmitted by the sender. It can take various forms, including verbal language, written text, nonverbal cues, visual images, or any other means of expression.
3. Channel: The channel refers to the medium through which the message is transmitted. It can be face-to-face conversation, written documents, telephone calls, emails, social media platforms, or any other communication tool or technology.
4. Receiver: The receiver is the individual or group receiving the message. They decode the message, interpreting and making sense of the information based on their own knowledge, experiences, and cultural background.
5. Feedback: Feedback plays a crucial role in the Schramm model. It represents the response or reaction of the receiver to the message. It can be conveyed through verbal or nonverbal cues, such as comments, questions, gestures, facial expressions, or even silence. Feedback provides an opportunity for clarification, confirmation, or further exchange of information.
6. Field of Experience: The field of experience encompasses the personal and social backgrounds, knowledge, beliefs, values, and cultural context of both the sender and receiver. It influences the encoding and decoding of messages and plays a significant role in shaping the understanding and interpretation of communication.
7. Noise: Noise refers to any interference or barrier that may disrupt or distort the communication process. It can be external, such as loud background noise or technical issues, or internal, such as distractions, preconceived notions, or language barriers. Noise can hinder the accurate transmission or interpretation of messages.
The Schramm model emphasizes that communication is a dynamic and interactive process. It recognizes that both the sender and receiver are simultaneously sending and receiving messages, and feedback loops allow for adjustments and improvements in understanding. This model highlights the importance of shared experiences, cultural context, and effective feedback for successful communication.
It's important to note that the Schramm model is a simplified representation of the complex nature of communication and may not capture all the intricacies involved in real-life interactions. Nonetheless, it provides a useful framework for understanding the interactive elements of communication.
6. Conclusion
Communication models are conceptual frameworks that depict the process of communication. They describe how information is transmitted, received, and interpreted between a sender and receiver. The Schramm model, also known as the Interactive Model, emphasizes the interactive and reciprocal nature of communication. It includes components such as the sender, message, channel, receiver, feedback, field of experience, and noise. This model recognizes that communication is a dynamic process involving encoding, decoding, and the exchange of messages. It emphasizes the role of feedback in enhancing understanding and highlights the influence of cultural context and shared experiences. However, it's important to remember that communication models are simplified representations and may not capture all the complexities of real-life communication.
7. References
- Arrow, K. J. (1979). The Economics of Information. In Dertouzos, M. L. and Moses, J. (Eds.), The computer Age: A Twenty-Year View (pp. 306-317). Cambridge: M I T Press.
- Atwood, M., & Dervin, B. (1982). Challenges to Sociocultural Predictors of Information Seeking. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
- Baptista, R. (1989). The Diffusion Process Innovations: A Selective Review. International Journal of Economics of Business, 61, 107.
- Bates, B. J. (1988). Information as an Economic Good: Sources of Individual and Social Value. In Mosco, V. and Wasco, J. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Information (pp. -). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Brown, L. A. (1981). Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective. New York: Methuen & Co.
- Brown, M. A. (1989). Diffusion. In Encyclopaedia of Communication (Vol. 1, pp. 31-36). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Buckland, M. (1991). Information as Thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351-360.
- Charpie, R. A. (1970). Technological Innovation and the International Economy. Fifth Annual Lecture of the Science Foundation. London: Wiley Interscience.
- Chatman, E. A. (1986). Diffusion Theory: A Review and Text of Conceptual Model in Information Diffusion. JASIS, 36, 377-386.
- Davies, S. (1979). The Diffusion Process Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dholakia, N., & Bakke, J. W. (1996). Institutional Patterns of Information Technology Diffusion. In Belk, R. et al. (Eds.), Consumption and Marketing Macro Dimensions (pp. 324-356). London: International Thomson Printing.
- Dutton, W. (Ed.). (1996). Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Geroski, P. A. (2000). Models of Technology Diffusion. Research Policy, 29(4/5), 603-625.
- Hall, B. H. (2003). Innovation and Diffusion. Preprint, 46p.
- Lennstrand, B. (1998). Diffusion of Information and Communication Technology to Households. Paper presented at the Twelfth Biennial ITS Conference at Stockholm.
- Lievrouw, L. A. (1988). Four Programs of Research in Scientific Communication. Knowledge in Society, 1(2), 6-22.
- Losse, R. M. (1990). The Science of Information. San Diego: Academic Press.
- McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Trends in Analyzing Access to Information pt. 1: Cross-disciplinary Conceptualizations of Access. Information Processing and Management, 35(19), 45-76.
- Maddock, I. (1981). Research Organizations and Their Contributions. In Conference on Innovation in Industry (pp. S233, CSIR). Pretoria.
- Mahajan, V., et al. (1990). New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Direction for Research. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1-26.
- Menou, M. (1994). The Impact of Information: Definitions and Measurements (Preprint, 1994).
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
- Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Stoneman, P. (2001). The Economics of Technological Diffusion. Oxford: Blackwell's.
- Taylor, R. (1996). Information Use Environments. In Auter, E., & Choo, C. (Eds.), Managing Information for the Competitive Edge. New York: Neal-Schuman.
- Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process (A. Pred, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Valente, T. (1995). Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
- Witson, T. D. (1981). On User Studies and Information Needs. J. Doc., 37(1), 3-15.
- Zettlemeyer, F., & Stoneman, P. L. (1993). Testing Alternative Models of New Product Diffusion. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2, 283-308.
***END***