Open Access Resources (OARs): Meaning, Evolution, Models, Advantages, Limitations and Role of Libraries and Library Professionals

Paper: BLIS-102: Information Sources and Services
Unit No: 3

1. Introduction

In the traditional system of scholarly communication, access to research results is restricted by the high cost of journals, books, and databases. Libraries and individuals often struggle to pay for subscriptions, especially in developing countries where budgets are limited. As a response, the concept of Open Access (OA) emerged in the late 20th century to promote equitable and barrier-free access to scholarly information.
The OA movement gained momentum through major initiatives such as the Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement (2003), and the Berlin Declaration (2003), which collectively emphasised the right of researchers and the public to freely access academic works. Open access aligns with the principle that publicly funded research should be available to the public without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
In the digital age, where the internet has transformed the way knowledge is shared, OA resources have become a cornerstone of open science and knowledge democratisation. They empower researchers, students, policymakers, and general readers to use information without paywalls, thus increasing the visibility, impact, and usability of knowledge worldwide.

2. Meaning

Open Access (OA) Resources are scholarly and educational materials that are freely available on the internet without subscription or price barriers. They allow anyone to read, download, copy, share, and use the content for learning, teaching, or research, provided the author’s rights are respected. OA is not limited to journals; it includes books, monographs, theses, dissertations, conference papers, research data, multimedia, and even learning objects.
The Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) defines OA as the free availability of literature on the public internet, permitting users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts without legal or financial restrictions. Similarly, the Berlin Declaration (2003) emphasised OA as an instrument for advancing knowledge and cultural heritage by ensuring unrestricted distribution of scholarly work.
In essence, OA resources aim to remove barriers between knowledge and its users, making scholarship universally accessible and reusable.

3. Evolution of Open Access

The OA movement did not start suddenly; it has evolved over decades as a response to the serials crisis (escalating journal subscription costs in the 1980s and 1990s). Academic institutions, particularly libraries, were unable to keep pace with rising costs, which limited access to vital research. Key milestones in the evolution:

4. Growth and Development of Open Access

The growth of OA has been rapid due to advances in digital technologies, the spread of the internet, and global support for knowledge equity. Journals and Articles: The number of OA journals has crossed 20,000 titles, covering nearly all disciplines (as per DOAJ 2024 data). OA articles are estimated to make up more than 50% of all scholarly publications worldwide, with strong growth in sciences, medicine, and social sciences.

5. Types / Models of Open Access

These are the major OA models. Some overlap. Some are “flavours” or “colour codes” rather than formally distinct legal structures.
Model / Type Definition & Mechanism Features & Characteristics Advantages Limitations / Challenges Examples
Gold Open Access Final version of the article/book is published directly as open access on the publisher’s platform. - Immediate free access on publisher's site
- Peer reviewed
- Often licensed under Creative Commons (CC-BY).
- High visibility and impact
- Meets funder mandates
- Provides official version of record
- High APCs exclude unfunded authors
- Risk of predatory journals exploiting APC model
PLOS ONE, BioMed Central, Frontiers, OAPEN (books)
Green Open Access Author self-archives a version of the work (preprint or postprint) in institutional or subject repository. - Deposit may be immediate or after embargo
- Version may differ from publisher’s final PDF
- Policies vary by publisher
- No cost for authors
- Increases visibility
- Supports preservation in repositories
- Embargo periods delay access
- Version differences confuse users
- Discoverability depends on repository indexing
arXiv (physics), PubMed Central, Shodhganga (India), institutional repositories
Hybrid Open Access Subscription journals offer OA option for individual articles if APC is paid. Other articles remain paywalled. - Mix of OA and non-OA in the same journal
- Immediate OA for paid articles
- Uses CC licences for OA articles
- Authors can choose OA in reputed journals
- Retains traditional subscription models
- Very costly (APCs + subscriptions)
- Controversial sustainability- Inequitable for authors
Elsevier’s Hybrid Journals, Springer’s Open Choice
Diamond / Platinum Open Access OA with no charges for readers or authors. Costs covered by societies, institutions, or governments. - Immediate free access
- Peer-reviewed
- No APC burden on authors
- Inclusive and equitable
- Promotes bibliodiversity
- Supports smaller, non-commercial journals
- Sustainability uncertain
- Limited budgets for editorial/publishing work
- May lack global visibility
SciELO (Latin America), Redalyc, many university/society journals
Bronze Open Access Articles are free-to-read on publisher website but lack clear licensing for reuse. - No APCs required
- Access sometimes withdrawn
- Lacks formal reuse rights
- Good for readers to access paywalled content free - Unstable, not legally OA
- Reuse restricted
- May be withdrawn anytime
Some Elsevier “Free Access” articles; free-to-read trials
Gratis Open Access Free access to read, but reuse rights are restricted (no redistribution or modifications). - Only reading permitted
- No full Creative Commons licence
- Expands readership- Easy to implement - Limited usability (cannot remix, translate, text-mine, etc.) Many OA articles marked “free-to-read” but not CC-licensed
Libre Open Access Free access to read with expanded reuse rights (depending on license, e.g., CC-BY). - Reading + reuse (e.g., redistribute, adapt, translate)
- Supports open science
- Enables innovation and data/text mining
- Aligns with OA declarations
- Requires strong copyright licensing clarity
- Not always enforced properly
Articles licensed CC-BY under Gold OA
Other Colour Models (e.g., Blue, Yellow, White) Labels used to describe publisher self-archiving policies (e.g., Blue = postprint + preprint allowed). - Provides nuanced categorization of OA rights - Helps authors understand permissions quickly - Can confuse beginners due to multiple labels SHERPA/RoMEO database of publisher OA policies
Key Takeaways

6. Advantages

7. Limitations or Challenges

8. Role of Libraries and Library Professionals


← All Papers
⇧ Scroll to Top
Disclaimer | About